|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
This represents a great change – and improvement – from the vulnerability and powerlessness experienced by those who acted with integrity and courage in earlier times. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was passed by Congress in direct response to the shocking revelations of corporate wrongdoing and accounting irregularities in the collapse of two large corporations: Enron and WorldCom. To combat the very substantial damage done to public confidence and the financial futures of many thousands of investors, Congress enacted potent measures to bring personal accountability directly to those who manage public corporations. Three aspects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (commonly called “Sox”) stand out as especially significant to executives who become aware of corporate wrongdoing:
Our firm has extensive experience in representing corporate executives in these matters. Through our experience we have gained a keen sensitivity to the nuances of the new law, as well as an understanding of the necessary complaint procedures. Should you be in need of assistance with a Sarbanes-Oxley claim, consider calling to arrange for a confidential consultation. Case History: We were contacted by Matt, Division President for a luxury goods retailer, responsible for Latin American operations. He’d started with the company 29 years earlier as a stock-boy, and had risen steadily over time. His division’s results were several percentage points better than any other division’s. So good that he expected a significant bonus for the year, due in a few weeks, and possible promotion. A problem, though, had arisen: a spot audit of sales tax compliance revealed that the division wasn’t properly reporting or paying local sales taxes. Matt’s Operations Director advised that the problem was widespread, so widespread that back payments and future compliance would make it impossible for the division to make “target” in the next quarter. Matt notified Dennis, the CEO, and the company General Counsel. Two weeks later, Dennis and the company’s CFO participated in a regularly scheduled conference call with Wall Street analysts. During that call, one analyst asked why Matt’s division was so successful, and asked whether it was “aberrational, or sustainable.” Dennis, the CEO, responded that it was due to Matt’s great leadership. Matt was astounded. There was no mention of his division’s inevitable failure to meet targeted numbers in the next quarter. There was no mention of the fact that other country-wide divisions, too, may have the same problem. He called Dennis, and shared with him his discomfort, and suggested they issue a corrective statement regarding the omission of the sales tax problem in the analyst conference call. Two weeks later Matt was summoned to New York to a meeting with the CEO at corporate headquarters. At the meeting, Matt was summarily fired, told not to return to his office, and immediately denied all payments and benefits, including return travel arrangements to the U.S. for his family. A week later he received a letter from the General Counsel, advising him that he’d been fired for “cause,” on the basis of his “misappropriation of corporate assets.” He allegedly had a $16.00 local magazine subscription mailed to his home paid with company funds. (Matt would read the magazine on the weekend, and bring it into the visitor waiting room on Monday.) After the company refused our requests to meet and talk, we filed a Sarbanes-Oxley complaint with the U.S. Dept. of Labor in New York. With our counsel, Matt had to sit through a 4-hour series of in-depth questions. When it came time for the company to file its written answer with the Dept. of Labor, and then have Dennis, its CEO, sit through his own “interrogation,” General Counsel asked for “a meeting.” Within a week, the matter was settled: Matt was given a sizable severance package, including additional stock, with full benefits, and an apology, as well. In return, he released Dennis, the CEO, and the Company, from further claims. Not all complaints can be expected to be handled as expeditiously and as successfully as was Matt’s. But things today are truly different: there now exists every reason to expect your Sarbanes-Oxley complaint of retaliation to be taken seriously by the U.S. Government, your corporate employer, and the courts. The day has passed when individuals who stand up for the values espoused by their corporate employers can be fired or otherwise retaliated against for doing so. Sarbanes-Oxley has truly begun to bring much-needed personal accountability to those who run our public companies. We welcome your inquiries on Sarbanes-Oxley. "A strong corporate culture is the invisible hand that guides how things
Sklover & Donath, LLC Ten Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10020 Tel: (212) 757-5000 Email: Info@ExecutiveLaw.com Copyright © 2008 Alan L. Sklover |
||||||||||||||||||||||