Special Concerns:
Sarbanes-Oxley Claims


Only since 2002 have executives employed by publicly-held companies had legal rights and financial recourse if fired, demoted or otherwise retaliated against for reporting or objecting to corporate wrongdoing.
For the first time, corporate officers who retaliate against those who work for them are now being held individually accountable for their retaliatory acts.

 


 YOUR CONCERNS
Executive Employment
Executive Compensation
Executive Severance
Executive Negotiation
 
SPECIAL CONCERNS
SARBANES-OXLEY CLAIMS
DISCRIMINATION/HARASSMENT
FINANCIAL TRADERS & ANALYSTS
FEDERAL "WHISTLE-BLOWER" LAWSUITS

 


This represents a great change – and improvement – from the vulnerability and powerlessness experienced by those who acted with integrity and courage in earlier times.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was passed by Congress in direct response to the shocking revelations of corporate wrongdoing and accounting irregularities in the collapse of two large corporations: Enron and WorldCom. To combat the very substantial damage done to public confidence and the financial futures of many thousands of investors, Congress enacted potent measures to bring personal accountability directly to those who manage public corporations.

Three aspects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (commonly called “Sox”) stand out as especially significant to executives who become aware of corporate wrongdoing:

  • CEOs and CFOs must now personally certify the accuracy of the quarterly and annual financial reports that the law mandates public corporations file, with very little room for excuses, as in “the dog ate my financial records.”

  • Lawyers who work for public corporations (whether “in-house” counsel or “outside” counsel), who become aware of allegations of corporate wrongdoing, no longer have an opportunity to help conceal the problem: they are now legally obligated to take the allegations to the corporation’s Board of Directors.

  • Most important to us, the Sox Act forbids retaliation against those who raise allegations of corporate wrongdoing to their corporate employers, and provide recourse in the form of mandatory reinstatement, reimbursement for lost compensation, and even attorneys’ fees.
Through its Whistle-Blower Program, the United States Department of Labor acts as the “watchdog” over these matters. Congress has given the U.S. Dept. of Labor a firm legislative mandate to encourage corporate executives and managers to report all observations of:

  • Accounting Irregularities
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • Corporate Governance Improprieties
  • Securities Laws Violations
And the legislative mandate to do so includes a new process to administer complaints of retaliatory acts.


Our firm has extensive experience in representing corporate executives in these matters. Through our experience we have gained a keen sensitivity to the nuances of the new law, as well as an understanding of the necessary complaint procedures. Should you be in need of assistance with a Sarbanes-Oxley claim, consider calling to arrange for a confidential consultation.

Case History: We were contacted by Matt, Division President for a luxury goods retailer, responsible for Latin American operations. He’d started with the company 29 years earlier as a stock-boy, and had risen steadily over time. His division’s results were several percentage points better than any other division’s. So good that he expected a significant bonus for the year, due in a few weeks, and possible promotion.

A problem, though, had arisen: a spot audit of sales tax compliance revealed that the division wasn’t properly reporting or paying local sales taxes. Matt’s Operations Director advised that the problem was widespread, so widespread that back payments and future compliance would make it impossible for the division to make “target” in the next quarter. Matt notified Dennis, the CEO, and the company General Counsel.

Two weeks later, Dennis and the company’s CFO participated in a regularly scheduled conference call with Wall Street analysts. During that call, one analyst asked why Matt’s division was so successful, and asked whether it was “aberrational, or sustainable.” Dennis, the CEO, responded that it was due to Matt’s great leadership.

Matt was astounded. There was no mention of his division’s inevitable failure to meet targeted numbers in the next quarter. There was no mention of the fact that other country-wide divisions, too, may have the same problem. He called Dennis, and shared with him his discomfort, and suggested they issue a corrective statement regarding the omission of the sales tax problem in the analyst conference call.

Two weeks later Matt was summoned to New York to a meeting with the CEO at corporate headquarters. At the meeting, Matt was summarily fired, told not to return to his office, and immediately denied all payments and benefits, including return travel arrangements to the U.S. for his family. A week later he received a letter from the General Counsel, advising him that he’d been fired for “cause,” on the basis of his “misappropriation of corporate assets.” He allegedly had a $16.00 local magazine subscription mailed to his home paid with company funds. (Matt would read the magazine on the weekend, and bring it into the visitor waiting room on Monday.)

After the company refused our requests to meet and talk, we filed a Sarbanes-Oxley complaint with the U.S. Dept. of Labor in New York. With our counsel, Matt had to sit through a 4-hour series of in-depth questions. When it came time for the company to file its written answer with the Dept. of Labor, and then have Dennis, its CEO, sit through his own “interrogation,” General Counsel asked for “a meeting.” Within a week, the matter was settled: Matt was given a sizable severance package, including additional stock, with full benefits, and an apology, as well. In return, he released Dennis, the CEO, and the Company, from further claims.

Not all complaints can be expected to be handled as expeditiously and as successfully as was Matt’s. But things today are truly different: there now exists every reason to expect your Sarbanes-Oxley complaint of retaliation to be taken seriously by the U.S. Government, your corporate employer, and the courts. The day has passed when individuals who stand up for the values espoused by their corporate employers can be fired or otherwise retaliated against for doing so. Sarbanes-Oxley has truly begun to bring much-needed personal accountability to those who run our public companies.

We welcome your inquiries on Sarbanes-Oxley.



"A strong corporate culture is the invisible hand that guides how things
are done in an organization. The phrase "You just don't do that here"
is extremely powerful, more so than any written rules or policy manuals."

                                                                     - Andrew S. Grove            
                                                                      Former CEO, Intel Corp.


RETURN TO THE TOP


"Someone to Stand Up With Me"™

Sklover & Donath, LLC
Ten Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (212) 757-5000
Email: Info@ExecutiveLaw.com

Copyright © 2008 Alan L. Sklover